The United States was not interested in the rest of the world until WWII. Our nation kept up its protectionist and no alliance philosophy until that war thrust us (were we dragged?) into a position of leadership. Exceptions to that basic idea did occasionally occur. There was the famous bombardment of pirates off the north coast of Africa in the early 1800s. That was an independent action that led to know alliances. WWI is the outstanding example of working together with other countries to defeat a common enemy. At the end of that war the United States did not join the League of Nations. Instead the country reverted to its no alliances philosophy.
The idea of no alliances apparently dates back to Thomas Jefferson. He extended Washington’s ideas in his March 4, 1801 inaugural address: “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.”
A Cato Institute article on free trade confirms the philosophy of high tariffs. The article provides a U.S. Department of Commerce graph that shows 30% import duties on durable goods until WWII. Pat Buchanan, the conservative talk show host and former presidential candidate, still contends that the United States would be better off economically if trade barriers were in place. He repeated that position on the McLaughlin Group on Friday August 21, 2009. When was the last time he went shopping? Walmart, Target, Sears, Best Buy, etc. are all part of the global market place.
It’s understandable why Buchanan and others believe that protectionism is the salvation for the United States. We can’t compete with other nations for many goods and services. Our cost of living is just too high.
Listed on President Barack Obama’s top five books to read this summer is Thomas Friedman’s The World is Flat. It’s a book that tells us something we already know but in horrifying detail. This book tells us about the interdependence of every nation in the world. The quote “President Obama will probably learn of the operation from CNN” evidences how well we have connected everyone. Even Mayanmar’s (Burma’s) secretive government has been unable to keep events in that country a secret from the world. Neither 10th century Muslims nor Asian dictators can stop the interconnected world. Visit Toronto, Canada and it’s like visiting the United Nations. You will realize the world cannot be turned back.
The answer to our dilemma is innovation and invention. This nation gave birth to assembly line manufacturing (Henry Ford’s factories), the telephone, the computer world, and the internet. It was Thomas Edison who invented the light bulb and the first recording devices. The largest and most successful aircraft manufacturing companies were built in the United States. It’s that creativity that will revitalize this nation.
What will it be? I don’t know. It could be new car batteries or new ways to generate electricity or something else. The new world has arrived. Get excited!
The Military Industrial Complex Lives
Let’s be honest. There is a big link between the Military and the industries that supply military equipment. This is not news. President Eisenhower warned of this issue in a 1961 speech. In case you have forgotten, he was the supreme commander of our European army in WWII.
Some of us would like to deny that military is not a necessity. There are people and nations in this world who would like to see the United States fail. The problem is that many Americans love military things. They love the fight. They love the equipment that helps the military carry out its assignments.
Military equipment needs evolve as the world changes. Some of that old reliable equipment is not necessary or appropriate in the year 2009 and beyond. That is obviously the result of new items that are technologically superior to those old reliable things. The most obvious item I have seen in news reports is the drone aircraft. Those drones are controlled from points thousands of miles away from the field of battle. 60 Minutes’ Lara Logan provided a report telling how the control of the “unmanned aerial vehicles” is accomplished in Nevada. This equipment really does make many of our manned aircraft obsolete.
The Boeing Company launched its own attack on public opinion by advertising the need for the C-17 cargo plane. A full page ad appeared in the Los Angeles Times. The Times reported that similar ads appeared in major newspapers around the nation. The same article provided interviews with people who are calling the continued manufacture of this plane as corporate welfare. There is a UAW union that of course contends that there is a need for this plane but they are interested in protecting the jobs of its members. The coast will be $275 million each.
I do not know how many other old reliable pieces of equipment are still on the “buy” list. Shouldn’t these decisions be made by the Secretary of Defense? It appears that politics and a need to provide welfare for various companies is taking priority over the nation’s real needs. Those 14,000 people that will be effected by closing down the Long Beach aircraft factory could be utilized manufacturing high speed trains, wind turbines for power generation or other needed products.
This information was obtained from Yahoo’s financial reports site (http://finance.yahoo.com). This is Operating Income. You could argue that their income per share is low. I would argue that the job they fulfill in our society requires that their profits remain even lower given their purpose.
| Quarter ending 6-30-09: |
Aetna |
$2.475 billion |
| |
Coventry Health Care |
$619 million |
| |
CIGNA |
$378 million |
| |
Humana |
$1.073 billion |
| |
UnitedHealth |
$859 million |
| |
WellPoint (Blue Cross/Blue Shield) |
$3.592 billion |